Perlaza

Perlaza v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20243:24-cv-00760California770 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBEN DARIO PERLAZA, Case No.: 3:24-cv-0760-CAB-AHG

Petitioner,

ORDER: (1) DENYING MOTION

v. FOR RECONSIDERATION [ECF No. 4]; AND

WARDEN, (2) GRANTING EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE IN FORMA

Respondent.

PAUPERIS APPLICATION OR PAY

FILING FEE

18 19 INTRODUCTION On April 22, 2024, Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241,1 along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF Nos. 1, 2. On April 30, 2024, the Court denied the IFP request and dismissed the action without prejudice because Petitioner failed provide

26 1 Petitioner was convicted in a criminal case before this Court, and sentenced to a Bureau of Prisons term 27 of 56 months on March 23, 2022. See 3:21-cr-0637-GPC, ECF No. 141. On April 22, 2024, Petitioner 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.