Claudio

Claudio v. PIA Industries Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20243:23-cv-01965California3,624 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CLAUDIO, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01965-JAH-VET

CDCR #AU-1732,

SCREENING ORDER RE

Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. 14 1) DISMISSING DEFENDANTS PIA

PIA INDUSTRIES, INC.;

INDUSTRIES, INC., CDCR, HOGAN, MICHAEL BIERBAUM; PIA Shoe

FLORES, EKWOST, HILL, PALMER

Factory Supervisor; CDCR; HOGAN;

AND DOES 1‒

VICTOR OJEDA, PIA Shoe Factory 17 Supervisor; FLORES; EKWOST; HILL,

AND

Warden; PALMER, Warden; DOES 1‒50,

Defendants. 2) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL

TO EFFECT SERVICE UPON

DEFENDANTS OJEDA AND

BIERBAUM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND 22 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) 23 I. BACKGROUND Before the Court is Plaintiff Robert Claudio’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), which requires sua sponte screening because Claudio is a prisoner seeking relief from government officials and proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (See ECF No. 9.) The Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.