Claudio
Claudio v. PIA Industries Inc.
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 3, 20243:23-cv-01965California3,624 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT CLAUDIO, Case No.: 3:23-cv-01965-JAH-VET
CDCR #AU-1732,
SCREENING ORDER RE
Plaintiff, AMENDED COMPLAINT vs. 14 1) DISMISSING DEFENDANTS PIA
PIA INDUSTRIES, INC.;
INDUSTRIES, INC., CDCR, HOGAN, MICHAEL BIERBAUM; PIA Shoe
FLORES, EKWOST, HILL, PALMER
Factory Supervisor; CDCR; HOGAN;
AND DOES 1‒
VICTOR OJEDA, PIA Shoe Factory 17 Supervisor; FLORES; EKWOST; HILL,
AND
Warden; PALMER, Warden; DOES 1‒50,
Defendants. 2) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL
TO EFFECT SERVICE UPON
DEFENDANTS OJEDA AND
BIERBAUM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND 22 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) 23 I. BACKGROUND Before the Court is Plaintiff Robert Claudio’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), which requires sua sponte screening because Claudio is a prisoner seeking relief from government officials and proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (See ECF No. 9.) The Court…