La Michoacana Plus Ice Cream Parlor Corp v. Windy City Paletas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 LA MICHOACANA PLUS ICE CREAM Case No.: 24-cv-00631-H-MMP 12 PARLOR CORP, a California corporation, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff,

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

v. [Doc. No. 32.] WINDY CITY PALETAS, INC., a California corporation; ECUAMEX 17 PALETAS, INC., a California corporation; SKY LIMIT ENTERPRISES II, INC., a Nevada corporation; KJAM 19 PALETAS, INC., a California corporation; ARTURO MIRANDA, an individual; KAYLA RINCON, an 21 individual; DIGMEY JARAMILLO, an individual; and DOES 1 through 50, Defendants. 24 On April 15, 2024, Defendants Windy City Paletas (“Windy City”), Ecuamex 25 Paletas, Inc., Sky Limit Enterprises II, Inc., KJAM Paletas, Inc., Arturo Miranda, Digmey 26 Jaramillo, and Kayla Rincon filed a partial motion to dismiss Plaintiff La Michoacana Plus 27 Ice Cream Parlor Corp (“LMP”)’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 28 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. (Doc. No. 32.) On May 6, 2024,…