Ndizeye
Ndizeye v. Caietti
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Daniel NDIZEYE, Case No.: 24-cv-0882-AGS-BLM
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. (ECF 2)
7 Judge Carolyn CAIETTI, Defendant.
Plaintiff Daniel Ndizeye, suing for alleged civil-rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, moves to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons below, that motion is denied. Typically, parties instituting a civil action in a United States district court must pay filing fees of $405.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). But if granted the right to proceed in forma pauperis, a plaintiff need not pay those fees. Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). An application for IFP status is sufficient if it indicates “that the affiant cannot pay the court costs and still afford the necessities of life.” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). Yet an IFP application must “allege poverty with some particularity, definiteness and…