Ndizeye

Ndizeye v. Caietti

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 7, 20243:24-cv-00882California580 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Daniel NDIZEYE, Case No.: 24-cv-0882-AGS-BLM

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

Plaintiff, PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS v. (ECF 2)

7 Judge Carolyn CAIETTI, Defendant.

Plaintiff Daniel Ndizeye, suing for alleged civil-rights violations under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, moves to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons below, that motion is denied. Typically, parties instituting a civil action in a United States district court must pay filing fees of $405.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). But if granted the right to proceed in forma pauperis, a plaintiff need not pay those fees. Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). An application for IFP status is sufficient if it indicates “that the affiant cannot pay the court costs and still afford the necessities of life.” Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015). Yet an IFP application must “allege poverty with some particularity, definiteness and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.