Alexander

Alexander v. Kao

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20243:24-cv-00853California1,300 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LIAM ALEXANDER, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00853-JO-SBC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO

vs. PROCEED IFP AND SCREENING

COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO

JOHNATHAN KAO,

U.S.C. § 1915(E)

Defendant. 16 17 On May 15, 2024, pro se Plaintiff Liam Alexander filed what he describes as a “personal injury” lawsuit against Defendant Johnathan Kao. Dkt. 1. He alleges that Mr. Kao’s actions caused him to suffer various injuries including life-threatening medical complications. Id. Accompanying this complaint, he also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. 2. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s IFP motion but dismisses Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff appears to allege that Defendant, his caretaker, has been interfering with his medical care. Dkt. 1. The entirety of his claims follows: The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.