Shallowhorn

Shallowhorn v. Carrillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20243:24-cv-00399California1,491 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFRED E. SHALLOWHORN, Case No.: 3:24-cv-0399-WQH-DTF

CDCR #P-13049,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) SUA SPONTE GRANTING

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

J. CARRILLO, F. NUNEZ, J. GALINDO, PAUPERIS AND

SGT. ESTRADA, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN

DOE #2, G. HOPPER, H. MOSELEY, F. (2) DENYING MOTION FOR

GUZMAN, R. VELEZ, APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

18 Defendants. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT

20 21 INTRODUCTION On February 26, 2024, Plaintiff Alfred E. Shallowhorn (“Plaintiff”), then- incarcerated at Centinela State Prison (“CEN”) and proceeding pro se, filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See ECF No. 1.) On March 11, 2024, the Court dismissed the case because Plaintiff had failed to pay the filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 3.) The Court gave Plaintiff 45 days (or until April 29, 2024) to have his case reopened by either…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.