Shallowhorn
Shallowhorn v. Carrillo
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMay 28, 20243:24-cv-00399California1,491 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALFRED E. SHALLOWHORN, Case No.: 3:24-cv-0399-WQH-DTF
CDCR #P-13049,
ORDER:
Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) SUA SPONTE GRANTING
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
J. CARRILLO, F. NUNEZ, J. GALINDO, PAUPERIS AND
SGT. ESTRADA, JOHN DOE #1, JOHN
DOE #2, G. HOPPER, H. MOSELEY, F. (2) DENYING MOTION FOR
GUZMAN, R. VELEZ, APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
18 Defendants. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS MOOT
20 21 INTRODUCTION On February 26, 2024, Plaintiff Alfred E. Shallowhorn (“Plaintiff”), then- incarcerated at Centinela State Prison (“CEN”) and proceeding pro se, filed a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (See ECF No. 1.) On March 11, 2024, the Court dismissed the case because Plaintiff had failed to pay the filing fee or move to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF No. 3.) The Court gave Plaintiff 45 days (or until April 29, 2024) to have his case reopened by either…