Alonso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER K. ALONSO, Case No.: 23cv5-LR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED

IMPERIAL COUNTY SHERIFF

COMPLAINT

DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. [ECF NO. 32] 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ “Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint” [ECF No. 32, ECF No. 32-1 (“Mot. Dismiss”)], Plaintiff’s Opposition [ECF No. 34 (“Opp’n”)1], and Defendants’ Reply [ECF No. 36 (“Reply”)]. After careful review and consideration of the allegations in Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, and for the reasons discussed in this order, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. 24 25 26 Plaintiff labeled this document as “Amended Reply.” (ECF No. 34 at 1.) To the extent Plaintiff intended this document to serve as his opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint, the Court will construe the filing as Plaintiff’s Opposition. 28 I. …