Scriber

Scriber v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 4, 20243:22-cv-01716California2,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL SCRIBER, et al., individually Case No. 22-cv-1716-MMA-MMP and on behalf all others similarly situated,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Plaintiffs, LEAVE TO AMEND AND FOR v. INDICATIVE RULING

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, [Doc. No. 32] Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiffs Michael Scriber, Stacy Powell, Doug Harrigan, and Susan Wisner Phillips (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) bring this putative class action against Ford Motor Company (“Ford”). On November 7, 2023, the Court denied Ford’s motion to compel arbitration, Doc. No. 27, and on December 1, 2023, Ford filed a Notice of Appeal, Doc. No. 28, USCA Case No. 23-3966. Plaintiffs have since filed a motion seeking leave to amend and asking the Court to issue an indicative ruling. Doc. No. 32. Ford filed a response in opposition to the motion, to which Plaintiffs replied. Doc. Nos. 39, 40. The Court found this motion suitable for determination on the papers and without oral 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.