Jayashankar
Kimera Labs Inc v. Jayashankar
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMERA LABS INC, Case No.: 21-cv-2137-MMA-DDL
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO SEAL UNREDACTED
RESPONSE AND EXHIBIT
EXOCEL BIO INC., RAJ
THERETO
JAYASHANKAR, ALEJANDRO
15 (ALEX) CONTRERAS, and DEB [Dkt. No. 239] HUBERS, Defendants. 18 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Seal a portion of their Response to Kimera’s Motion for Leave to Take Additional Discovery Regarding Certain Non-Parties Providing Relevant Services to Defendants and Motion to Compel Financial Documents (“Response”). Dkt. No. 239. Specifically, Defendants move to redact portions of their Response which reference Defendant Exocel Bio Inc.’s confidential business practices. Defendants have demonstrated that good cause exists to redact this information in order to prevent competitors from accessing the information and using it to their advantage. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’…