Jayashankar

Kimera Labs Inc v. Jayashankar

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 14, 20243:21-cv-02137California1,009 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMERA LABS INC, Case No.: 21-cv-2137-MMA-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO SEAL UNREDACTED

RESPONSE AND EXHIBIT

EXOCEL BIO INC., RAJ

THERETO

JAYASHANKAR, ALEJANDRO

15 (ALEX) CONTRERAS, and DEB [Dkt. No. 239] HUBERS, Defendants. 18 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Seal a portion of their Response to Kimera’s Motion for Leave to Take Additional Discovery Regarding Certain Non-Parties Providing Relevant Services to Defendants and Motion to Compel Financial Documents (“Response”). Dkt. No. 239. Specifically, Defendants move to redact portions of their Response which reference Defendant Exocel Bio Inc.’s confidential business practices. Defendants have demonstrated that good cause exists to redact this information in order to prevent competitors from accessing the information and using it to their advantage. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.