Tarkett

Tarkett v. USAA General Indemnity Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 10, 20243:23-cv-01724California5,220 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH TARKETT, individually and Case No.: 3:23-cv-01724-H-BLM on behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO DISMISS WITH v. LEAVE TO AMEND

USAA GENERAL INDEMNITY

[Doc. No. 15.] COMPANY, a Texas Corporation, Defendant. 17 On December 11, 2024, Defendant USAA General Indemnity Company (“Defendant”) filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff Joseph Tarkett’s (“Plaintiff”) first amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 12(b)(1), and 12(b)(6). (Doc. No. 15.) On January 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 18.) On January 29, 2024, Defendant filed a reply. (Doc. No. 19.) On March 28, 2024, the Court, pursuant to its discretion under Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), submitted the motion on the parties’ papers. (Doc. No. 22.) For…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.