Tijerina

Tijerina v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20243:22-cv-00203California689 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BEATRIZ TIJERINA, individually, Case No.: 22-CV-203 JLS (DTF)

Plaintiff,

ORDER SUA SPONTE (1) STRIKING

v. SECOND AMENDED JOINT

PROPOSED PRETRIAL ORDER

ALASKA AIRLINES, INC.,

AND (2) CONTINUING FINAL

an Alaska Corporation; and DOES 1–50, PRETRIAL CONFERENCE Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 119) 17 Presently before the Court is the Parties’ Second Amended Joint Proposed Pretrial Order (“Proposed Order,” ECF No. 119), which they submitted ahead of a final pretrial conference scheduled for June 27, 2024. See ECF No. 111. The Proposed Order was originally due by June 10. See id. On that date, the Parties requested an extension to June 12, ECF No. 115, which the Court granted, ECF No. 116. Nevertheless, the Parties did not file the Proposed Order until June 14. Beyond the Parties’ tardiness, however, the Proposed Order is deficient in a more important way—it fails to comply with the Court’s prior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.