Alexander

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LIAM ALEXANDER, Case No.: 24-cv-00979-JAH

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) DISMISSING COMPLAINT CHIME,

WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND

Defendant. (2) DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS. On June 3, 2024, Plaintiff Liam Alexander (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendant Chime (“Defendant”) alleging that Defendant breached an agreement and “is harassing and abusing Plaintiff.” ECF No. 1 (“Complaint” or “Compl.”). Plaintiff has also filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). ECF No. 2 (“Motion”). When a plaintiff seeks leave to proceed IFP, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the Complaint is subject to sua sponte review and mandatory dismissal if it is “frivolous or malicious,” “fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or “seeks monetary relief from a defendant immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); Coleman v. 26 …