Vaughn

Vaughn v. Parker

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 6, 20243:18-cv-02098California6,100 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHARIFFE VAUGHN, Case No.: 3:18-cv-02098-JAH-MMP

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

CORRECTIONAL OFFICER A. [ECF No. 159]

PARKER,

16 Defendant. 17 18 Pending before this Court is Defendant Correctional Officer A. Parker’s (“Defendant”) Motion for Sanctions against Plaintiff Shariffe Vaughn (“Plaintiff”) for failure to timely disclose a percipient witness, which was filed with this Court on December 15, 2023. ECF No. 159 (the “Motion” or “Mot.”). Plaintiff filed an Opposition on February 1, 2024. ECF No. 161 (“Opp’n”). Defendant filed a Reply on February 15, 2024. ECF No. 164 (“Reply”). A motion hearing on this matter took place before this Court on February 28, 2024. After a careful review of the pleadings and consideration of the parties’ arguments, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions. /// /// BACKGROUND The case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.