Wells

Wells v. Sanofi S.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20243:23-cv-02134California641 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RACHAEL WELLS, Case No.: 23-CV-2134 JLS (BLM)

Plaintiff,

ORDER CONTINUING STAY

v.

SANOFI S.A.; AVENTIS PHARMA S.A.; SANOFI US SERVICES INC. f/k/a

SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. INC.; SANOFI-

AVENTIS U.S. LLC; HOSPIRA WORLDWIDE, LLC f/k/a HOSPIRA

WORLDWIDE, INC.; HOSPIRA, INC.;

PFIZER, INC., Defendants. 20 Presently before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Status Report (“JSR,” ECF No. 27). At the Parties’ request, the Court previously stayed this case for ninety days to allow the Parties to pursue a master settlement resolving this and other cases spun out from the multi- district litigation that spawned this case. ECF No. 25 (the “Order”). Ninety days have passed, and the Parties indicate they “have finalized and signed a Memorandum of Understanding and are cooperatively working out the remaining paperwork and settlement administration process.” JSR at 2. The Parties thus “anticipate a dismissal will be filed 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.