Ganey

Ganey v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 20, 20243:23-cv-01448California766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHELLE DIANE GANEY AND Case No.: 23-cv-1448-CAB-AHG

MICHAEL JAMES GANEY, JR.,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

Plaintiffs, LEAVE TO FILE SECOND v. AMENDED COMPLAINT

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO et al., 15 [Doc. No. 34] Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiffs Michelle Ganey and Michael Ganey initiated this lawsuit on August 7, 2023, by filing a complaint [Doc. No. 1] along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) [Doc. No. 2]. The Court granted the application to proceed IFP but dismissed the complaint without prejudice pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) because the complaint included claims by minors who were not represented by counsel. [Doc. No. 5.] Consistent with the Court’s order, Plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint (“FAC”) [Doc. No. 7] on October 3, 2023, listing only themselves as Plaintiffs. The FAC purported to assert claims against the County of San Diego along with eight individual county employees who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.