Cox

Dalrada Precision Corp. v. Cox

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 21, 20243:23-cv-01064California1,857 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DALRADA PRECISION CORP., Case No.: 23-CV-1064 JLS (DEB) a California corporation, wholly owned 12 subsidiary of DALRADA FINANCIAL ORDER DISMISSING ACTION CORPORATION, a Wyoming WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT corporation, TO FEBRUARY 9, 2024 ORDER

Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 STUART COX, an individual, 17 Defendant.

This case has been pending for more than one year. Despite warnings from the Court, Plaintiffs Dalrada Precision Corporation and Dalrada Financial Corporation (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) have failed to either (1) serve Defendant Stuart Cox or (2) provide an update on their progress on that front as required by this Court’s February 9, 2024 Order (“Order,” ECF No. 12). For the reasons that follow, the Court DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. BACKGROUND The instant case involves a dispute stemming from Plaintiffs’ acquisition of Likido Limited, a company then owned by Defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.