Hipschman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 22-cv-903-AJB-BLM CAROLINA HIPSCHMAN et al. ,

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPEL

v. DEFENDANT COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO’S

FURTHER RESPONSES TO REQUEST

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO et al.,

FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS,

Defendants. SET THREE

[ECF No. 64]

18 Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs Alexander Hipschman and Carolina Hipschman’s Motion to Compel Defendant County of San Diego to Provide Further Responses to Requests for Production of Documents, Set Three [ECF No. 64-1 (“Motion”)], the Declaration of Stephen D. Daner in support thereof [ECF No. 64-2 (“Daner Decl.”)], Defendant County of San Diego’s opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion [ECF No. 69 (“Oppo.”)], and the Declaration of Jeffrey Miyamoto in support thereof [ECF No. 69-1 (“Miyamoto Decl.”)]. For the reasons discussed below, Plaintiffs’ Motion is GRANTED IN PART. /// 27 …