Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20243:23-cv-01847California3,046 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FIREMAN'S FUND INSURANCE CO., Case No.: 3:23-cv-01847-CAB-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS,

DENYING IN PART JOINT MOTION

INC.,

TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING Defendant. ORDER, and

(2) ISSUING FIRST AMENDED

SCHEDULING ORDER

[ECF No. 20] 20 21 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to modify the scheduling order. ECF No. 20. The parties seek an order from the Court extending all case management deadlines by approximately three months. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); see also Chmb.R. at 2 (stating that any request for continuance requires “[a] showing of good cause for the request”). Courts have broad discretion in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.