Estate of William Hayden Schuck v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 28, 20243:23-cv-00785California2,290 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ESTATE OF WILLIAM HAYDEN Case No.: 3:23-cv-00785-DMS-AHG SCHUCK, et al., ORDER: Plaintiffs, 14 (1) GRANTING IN PART JOINT v. MOTION TO MODIFY THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., SCHEDULING ORDER, and

Defendants. (2) ISSUING SECOND AMENDED

SCHEDULING ORDER

[ECF No. 71] 20 21 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to modify the scheduling order. ECF No. 71. The parties seek an order from the Court extending certain case management deadlines by approximately two months. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); ECF No. 57 at 7 (Amended Scheduling Order, stating that “[t]he dates [] set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”); see also Chmb.R.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.