Tichenor

Tichenor v. Bae Systems Technology Solutions & Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20243:20-cv-00499California3,135 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 DEBORAH J. TICHENOR, Case No.: 20cv499-JM-BGS Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTIONS TO RETAX

v.

COSTS

BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS AND SERVICES, INC., et 15 al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Presently before the court is Plaintiff Deborah J. Tichenor’s Motion (Doc. No. 190) and Defendant BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services, Inc.’s Cross-Motion to Retax Costs (Doc. No. 191). Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the court finds the matters presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. Having considered the Parties’ arguments, the evidence, and the law, the court rules as follows. BACKGROUND Plaintiff brought this action against Defendant, arising from her employment and subsequent resignation from BAE’s San Diego Biometric Support Center. A jury trial commenced on May 17, 2022 on Plaintiff’s claim for constructive discharge under California’s Fair Housing and Employment Act (“FEHA”). (Doc. No. 134). At trial, it became…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.