Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20243:24-cv-00196California996 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, Case No.: 3:24-cv-00196-RBM-VET LLC; et. al.,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO FILE DECLARATION OF Plaintiffs,

MARK D. SCHMIDT UNDER SEAL

14 vs. [Doc. 22]

CYBERLUX CORPORATION; et. al.,

17 Defendants. 18 19 On April 18, 2024, Defendant Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt (collectively, “Defendants”) filed Notice of Motion and Motion to File Declaration of Mark D. Schmidt Under Seal (“Motion”) in support of their opposition to Plaintiffs’ anti-SLAPP motion to strike. (Doc. 22.) In their Motion, Defendants “request leave to seal the Declaration of Mark D. Schmidt in part, seeking only to seal Paragraph 8, which provides details about a term within the parties’ Confidential Settlement Agreement” relating to a litigation in Virginia state court. (Id. at 3–4.) Defendants also “request leave to seal Exhibit A to the Declaration of Mark D. Schmidt in full, as Exhibit A is the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.