Morton

Morton v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 26, 20243:21-cv-01428California748 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARILYN MORTON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-1428-MMA-DDL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. FILE UNDER SEAL; AND

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., [Doc. No. 226] Defendants.

GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO ALLOW NON-ELECTRONIC

FILING

18 [Doc. No. 231] 19 20 On June 14, 2024, Defendants the County of San Diego, Hosanna Alto, and Janine Sparks filed a renewed motion for leave to file Exhibits 1–45 in support of their summary judgment motion under seal. Doc. No. 226. Thereafter, they filed a motion seeking leave to allow the non-electronic filing of eleven audio file exhibits. Doc. No. 231. Their motions are unopposed to date. When presented with a request to file a document under seal, the Court begins with the strong presumption in favor of the “general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Nixon v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.