Rojas Martinez v. Clake LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 2, 20243:24-cv-00685California2,052 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ORQUIDEA ROJAS MARTINEZ; Case No.: 3:24-cv-00685-JAH-SBC

RICARDO RUIZ,

ORDER:

Plaintiffs, 14 v. (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

CLAKE LLC; EDDI MATTI,

PAUPERIS; Defendants. 17 (2) DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT;

19 (3) DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

(ECF Nos. 1, 2) INTRODUCTION On April 16, 2024, Orquidea Rojas Martinez and Ricardo Ruiz (“Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint seeking relief against Clake LLC and Eddi Matti (“Defendants”). ECF No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiffs also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), (ECF No. 2), and an affidavit in support of a request for appointment of counsel, (ECF No. 1). After a review of the pleadings and for the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.