Giguiere

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Giguiere

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20243:18-cv-01530California4,574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 18-cv-1530-WQH-JLB

COMMISSION,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

Plaintiff, DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT v. HACKETT’S MOTION TO REOPEN

DISCOVERY

GANNON GIGUIERE, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 [ECF NO. 193] 18 19 Before the Court is Defendant Andrew Hackett’s (“Hackett”) Motion to Reopen Fact Discovery. (ECF No. 193.) Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) opposes the motion. (ECF No. 195.) For the reasons set forth below, Defendant Hackett’s motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background On July 6, 2018, the SEC filed a complaint against Defendants Gannon Giguiere, Oliver-Barret Lindsay, Andrew Hackett, Kevin Gillespie, and Annetta Budhu. (ECF No. 1.) The SEC filed First and Second Amended Complaints on August 5, 2022, and April 7, 2023, respectively. (ECF Nos. 92, 136.) The Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) 2 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.