Brink

Brink v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 3, 20243:23-cv-01756California7,451 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No.: 23cv1756 DMS (SBC)

JEREMY BRINK,

Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION TO DISMISS

PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; DOE

COMPLAINT

SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES 1-5, Individually; 13 DOE SHERIFF'S NURSES 6-10, Individually; and DOES 11-15, Individually, Inclusive 15 Defendants.

Pending before the Court is Defendant San Diego County’s (“Defendant” or “the County”) motion to dismiss, (ECF No. 7), Plaintiff Jeremy Brink’s First Amended Complaint, ((“FAC”), ECF No. 6), for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 12(b)(6). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition, (ECF No. 10), and Defendant filed a reply. (ECF No. 12.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants in part and denies in part Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND In July 2022, the San Diego County Sheriff’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.