Burke

Burke v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 1, 20243:24-cv-00182California3,879 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 GREG BURKE, Case No.: 24-cv-00182-WQH-DTF

Plaintiff, ORDER v. 15 CITY OF SAN DIEGO; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. 19 HAYES, Judge: I. BACKGROUND On February 15, 2024, Plaintiff Greg Burke (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, initiated this action by filing a Complaint. (ECF No. 1.) The same day, Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) (ECF No. 2) and a Request for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 3). On April 4, 2024, the Court issued an Order denying Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed IFP. (ECF No. 4.) On May 1, 2024, Plaintiff filed a renewed Application to Proceed IFP. (ECF No. 6.) II. APPLICATIOIN TO PROCEED IFP All parties instituting a civil action in a district court of the United States, other than a petition for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $405. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); S.D. Cal. CivLR 4.5. An…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.