Brown
Brown v. Nano Hearing Tech Opco, LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEPHANIE BROWN, individually and Case No.: 3:24-cv-00221-BTM-JLB on behalf of others similarly situated,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
Plaintiff, NANO HEARING AIDS’ MOTION TO v. DISMISS
NANO HEARING TECH OPCO, LLC
[ECF NO. 6] d/b/a NANO HEARING AIDS, 16 Defendant.
20 Defendant Nano Hearing Tech Opco, LLC doing business as Nano Hearing Aids 21 (“Nano”) has filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint. (ECF No. 6 (“Def.’s 22 MTD”).) In response, Plaintiff Stephanie Brown (“Brown”) filed an opposition. (ECF 23 No. 7 (“Pls.’ Opp’n”)). Nano then filed a reply. (ECF No. 10 (“Def.’s Reply”).) For the 24 reasons discussed below, the Court grants Nano’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to 25 Strike. 26 1 I. BACKGROUND Brown, on behalf of herself and a potential class, filed suit against Nano alleging unsolicited marketing that constitutes negligent and willful violations of the Telephone 4 …