Carlborg

Carlborg v. Department of Navy

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 12, 20243:23-cv-02073California817 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ROBERT S. CARLBORG, Case No.: 3:23-cv-02073-RBM-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER:

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART JOINT DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY and MOTION FOR EXTENSION, and

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE,

16 (2) ISSUING FIRST AMENDED Defendants. SCHEDULING ORDER

18 [ECF No. 20] 19 20 21 Before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to continue the summary judgment briefing schedule. ECF No. 20. The parties seek an order from the Court extending the summary judgment filing deadlines by approximately five months. Id. Parties seeking to continue deadlines in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause. FED. R. CIV. P. 16(b)(4) (“A schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent”); see also ECF No. 19 at 2 (Scheduling Order, stating that “[t]he dates [] set forth herein will not be modified except for good cause shown”). Courts have broad discretion in determining whether there is good cause. See,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.