Jackson v. O' Malley

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20243:24-cv-01124California1,658 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VAUGHN J., Case No.: 3:24-cv-01124-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of

WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 [Doc. No. 2] 18

23 24

26 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(e)(6)(b), “[o]pinions by the Court in [Social Security cases under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2022)] will refer to any non-government parties by 28 I. INTRODUCTION On June 27, 2024, Plaintiff Vaughn J. (“Plaintiff”) filed this action, seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security’s (“Commissioner”) final decision denying his application for Supplemental Security Income benefits (“Complaint”). Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff also filed an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“IFP Application”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Doc. No. 2. For the reasons stated below,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.