Kijakazi

Johnson v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 11, 20243:23-cv-00481California3,541 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES JOHNSON, Case No.: 23-CV-481 JLS (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING EX PARTE

v. MOTION TO VACATE OR

RECONSIDER COURT’S

MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner,

MAY 6, 2024 ORDER

Social Security Administration; ERIC V. 15 BENHAM, Administrate Law Judge; (ECF No. 55) LAURA MIDDLETON, Administrative Appeals Judge; MS. KAWANO (full 17 name and title to be ascertained); and DOES 4 to 100, Defendants. 20 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff James Johnson’s Ex Parte Motion to Vacate or Reconsider Court’s May 6, 2024 Order (“Mot.,” ECF No. 55). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s arguments, the law, and the contents of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC,” ECF Nos. 46, 46-1),1 the Court DENIES the Motion.

26 1 The SAC was filed in two parts; the first 84 pages (SAC ¶¶ 1–407) are contained in ECF No. 46, while 27 pages 85 to 169 (SAC ¶¶ 408–976) can be found in ECF No. 46-1. As the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.