Marin

Marin v. Catano

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 8, 20243:21-cv-01445California2,010 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MEL MARIN, Case No.: 3:21-cv-01445-JO-MMP

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO SEAL, MOTION TO

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE

STRIKE, MOTION FOR SUMMARY

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY,

JUDGMENT AND GRANTING Defendant. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17

On June 17, 2024, Defendant Board of Trustees of the California State University (“SDSU”) moved for summary judgment, asserting that pro se Plaintiff, Mel Marin, cannot establish violations of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. Dkt. 94-1 (“Def.’s Mot. Summ. J.”). Plaintiff, on the other hand, moved for summary judgment, claiming that he has proved that SDSU violated the ADA and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act as a matter of law. Dkt. 96-1 (“Pl.’s Mot. Summ. J.”). In addition, Plaintiff moved to strike the exhibits Defendant filed in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.