Garrett

Garrett v. Sycuan Casino

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20243:24-cv-01296California165 words

Trial Court Opinion

fa >>

United States District Court

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

William Allen Garrett Civil Action No. 24-cv-1296-JES-SBC

Plaintiff, V. Sycuan Casino; Slot Machine Supervisor; CLERK'S JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CA Security et al

Defendant.

Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

The Court Dismisses with prejudice Garrett’s Complaint in its entirety based on his failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and 1915A(b)(1); and the Court finds amendment would be futile. See Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood, 759 F.3d 1112, 1116 (9th Cir. 2014) (“Futility of amendment can, by itself, justify the denial of ... leave to amend.’”’) (quoting Bonin v. Calderon, 59 F.3d 815, 845 (9th Cir. 1995)). The case is hereby closed.

Date: 8/13/ CLERK OF COURT JOHN MORRILL, Clerk of Court By: s/ M. Quinata M. Quinata, Deputy