Thomas

Thomas v. Aguilar

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20243:22-cv-00979California7,179 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 10 WILLIAM H. THOMAS, Case No.: 22-cv-0979-RSH-DEB 11 Plaintiff,

REPORT AND

12 v. RECOMMENDATION ON CROSS- MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY

AGUILAR, CORRECTIONAL

JUDGMENT

OFFICER,

Defendant. [DKT. NOS. 38, 51]

17 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge 18 Robert S. Huie pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Civil Local Rules 72.1(c) and 72.3(e). 19 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff William H. Thomas, a prisoner in the custody of the California Department 21 of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”), is proceeding pro se with a First Amended 22 Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Thomas alleges Defendant Correctional Officer 23 Aguilar violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to timely respond to a broken 24 toilet in Thomas’s cell. Dkt. No. 5.1

26 1 The Court screened the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) and found Thomas plausibly alleged an Eighth Amendment violation against Aguilar. Dkt. No. 6. Thomas subsequently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.