Krause-Pettai
Krause-Pettai v. Unilever United States, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 Nicole KRAUSE-PETTAI, et al., Case No.: 20-cv-1672-AGS-BLM individually and on behalf of ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S all others similarly situated,
RENEWED MOTION TO SEAL
Plaintiffs, (ECF 91) v. UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC., et al., 9 Defendants.
After the Court granted summary judgment for defendant Unilever (see ECF 90), the defense renewed its previously denied request to seal certain filings. BACKGROUND Unilever moves to seal or redact: (1) portions of David Tropia’s declaration (ECF 68 (unredacted); ECF 69- (redacted)); (2) Exhibits A through E to that declaration (ECF 68-1, 68-2, 68-3, 68-4, 68-5 (unredacted); ECF 69-23, 69-24, 69-25, 69-26, 69-27 (redacted)); and (3) parts of Exhibits through to Naoki S. Kaneko’s declaration (ECF 67-1, 67-2, 67-3 (unredacted); ECF 69-2, 69-3, 69-4 (redacted)). Paragraphs 34–38 and 41 of David Tropia’s declaration “reference internal technical 20…