Ruffin

Ruffin v. Dudek and Associates

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 16, 20243:22-cv-00191California1,043 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIMONE RUFFIN, Case No.: 3:22-cv-00191-RBM-BJC

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTIONS

DUDEK AND ASSOCIATES, INC. et [Docs. 52–55, 58] al., 15 Defendants.

DUDEK AND ASSOCIATES, INC.,

18 Cross Claimant, 19 v. 20 TEKSYSTEMS, INC., et al., 21 Cross Defendants. 22 23 Plaintiff Simone Ruffin (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this case alleging various employment-related claims against Defendant Dudek and Associates, Inc. (“Defendant”). (Doc. 1.) Despite the Court’s order compelling arbitration and staying this case pending the conclusion of arbitration (Doc. 40), as well as three subsequent Court orders reiterating that this case is stayed pending arbitration (Docs. 41, 44, 50), Plaintiff has filed more motions in this stayed case. (Docs. 52–55, 58.) For the reasons set forth below, these motions are DENIED, and this case remains stayed pending the conclusion of the arbitration. On February 8, 2023, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.