Thompson
Thompson v. Wallace Commercial Landscape
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MCKENZIE THOMPSON, Case No.: 23-cv-01530-AJB-DDL Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v.
WALLACE COMMERCIAL (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
14 LANDSCAPE; and DOES 1 through 25, MOTION FOR SUMMARY inclusive, JUDGMENT; and Defendant. 16 (2) DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
18 (Doc. Nos. 14 & 15) 19 Before the Court is Defendant Wallace Commercial Landscape’s motions for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 14), and Rule 11 sanctions, (Doc. No. 15). The motions have been fully briefed, (Doc. Nos. 19, 20, 22, 23), and the matter is suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1.d.1. Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the hearing currently set for August 29, 2024, at 2:00 p.m. For the reasons stated herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and DENIES Defendant’s motion for Rule 11 sanctions. /// /// I. BACKGROUND …