Jayashankar

Kimera Labs Inc v. Jayashankar

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20243:21-cv-02137California5,163 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIMERA LABS INC, Case No.: 21-cv-2137-MMA-DDL

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON JOINT MOTION FOR

v. DETERMINATION OF DISCOVERY

DISPUTE RE PLAINTIFF’S RULE

EXOCEL BIO INC., et al., 30(b)(6) DEPOSITION OF Defendants. DEFENDANT EXOCEL BIO

16 [Dkt. No. 300]

19 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff has noticed the deposition of defendant Exocel Bio pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6). The deposition notice contains 85 topics, and Exocel Bio objects to certain of those topics. The parties’ Joint Motion contains their respective positions regarding the disputed topics. The Court held a motion hearing on August 12, 2024. / / / / / / II. DISCUSSION The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permit a broad scope of discovery: “Parties may obtain discovery regarding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.