Holifield
Holifield v. NexusCw, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREA HOLIFIELD, individually and Case No.: 3:24-cv-00353-RBM-MMP for others similarly situated,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
Plaintiffs, MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE v. 14 [Doc. 11]
NEXUSCW, INC.,
15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant NexusCW, Inc.’s (“Defendant”) motion to transfer venue (“Motion”). (Doc. 11-1.) Plaintiffs Andrea Holifield, Shalom Robertson,1 and William Johanning,2 on behalf of a class of similarly situated employees (“the Hourly 21 22
24 1 Plaintiff Holifield filed a notice of consent on behalf of Robertson to join this Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) collective action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(3). (Doc. 3.) Robertson worked for NexusCW in Maryland and Texas. (Doc. 18 at 16 (citing Doc. 12- 26 3 ¶ 2).) 2 Plaintiff Holifield filed a notice of consent on behalf of Johanning to join this FLSA collective action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(3). (Doc. 16.) Johanning worked for 28 Recruiters”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed an …