Hammett

Hammett v. Sherman

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 15, 20243:19-cv-00605California2,205 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LAURA LYNN HAMMETT, Case No.: 19cv605-LL-AHG

Plaintiff,

ORDER FOLLOWING ORDER TO

v. SHOW CAUSE ISSUED JUNE 14, 2024 MARY E. SHERMAN, et al.

Defendants. 16 Before the Court are responses to an Order to Show Cause issued on June 14, 2024. ECF No. 317. Following Plaintiff’s filing of a document titled “Plaintiff’s Opposition to Issuance of Abstract of Judgment” [ECF No. 316], the Court issued an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”) why execution on the judgments as to attorneys’ fees awarded to Defendants should be stayed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62. ECF No. 317. Plaintiff filed a Response to the OSC [ECF No. 318] and Defendants Ellis Roy Stern, Alan N. Goldberg, and Stern & Goldberg (collectively the “S&G Defendants”) filed an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Response [ECF No. 319]. The Court finds this matter suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.