Kaminsky

Kaminsky v. Cisa, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20243:24-cv-00286California2,356 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CASEY KAMINSKY, Case No.: 24-CV-0286-JO-VET

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING REQUEST

v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS; (2) SCREENING

CISA, INC. aka CYBERSECURITY

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915

AND INFRASTRUCTURE SECURITY

AGENCY; CW SACRAMENTO

FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATIONS; META

17 PLATFORMS, INC. aka FACEBOOK, 18 Defendants. 19 20 Plaintiff Casey Kaminsky, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 alleging that federal agencies and private entities violated her First Amendment rights when they censored her social media postings on her Facebook accounts. Dkt. 4, First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Plaintiff also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and a motion to appoint counsel. Dkts. 2–3. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants Plaintiff’s IFP request, dismisses her complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2), and denies her motion to appoint counsel.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.