Kard

Kard v. GMAC Mortage, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20243:23-cv-01780California975 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NICHOLE KARD, Case No.: 3:23-cv-1780-W-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. RECONSIDER, VACATING

REMAND ORDER, AND ORDERING

GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC; REAL TIME

RECALL OF REMAND

RESOLUTIONS; RRA CP

OPPORTUNITY TRUST 2; ZBS LAW

LLP; DOES 1-100, [Doc. 8] Defendants. 18 On March 4, 2024, the Court remanded this case after finding that the removing parties’ allegation regarding the amount in controversy lacked plausibility in light of counsel’s declaration that the full amount of the lien at issue had been received. On April 1, Defendants Real Time Resolutions, Inc. (“Real Time”) and RRA CP Opportunity Trust 2 (“RRA”) filed a motion to reconsider and supplemented the evidence regarding the amount in controversy. (Motion [Doc. 8]; Stip. [Doc. 8-3]). Plaintiff opposed. Real Time and RRA replied. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.