Broaddus

Broaddus v. Trans Union LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20243:23-cv-01867California2,312 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN BROADDUS, Case No.: 23-cv-1867-DMS-DEB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS TRANS UNION LLC; EQUIFAX

INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; AND

EXPERIAN INFORMATION

SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendants. 18 Pending before the Court is Defendants Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”) and Experian Information Solutions, Inc.’s (“Experian”) joint motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (“Defs.’ Mot.”), ECF No. 25.) Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, did not file a response in opposition. Instead, Plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 26), and a Fourth Amended Complaint

25 1 Civil Local Rule 7.1(f)(3)(c) states that if an opposing party fails to file a response in opposition to a motion, that failure may constitute consent to the granting of a motion. A district court may grant an unopposed motion pursuant to a local rule which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.