Panus
Panus v. Ava Law Group, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN PANUS, Case No.: 23cv02018 DMS (JLB) TDCJ No. 2167693,
ORDER GRANTING RENEWED
Plaintiff, MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA vs. PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING
CIVIL ACTION
FOR FAILING TO STATE A
AVA LAW GROUP, CLAIM PURSUANT TO
16 Defendant. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) 17 [ECF No. 5] 18 Plaintiff Justin Panus (“Plaintiff”), currently a prisoner in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, and proceeding pro se, has filed a “Motion to Compel Arbitration.” (See ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) to commence a civil action, but instead filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). While Plaintiff’s initial IFP motion was denied based on his failure to attach certified copies of his prison trust account statements as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2), he has since filed a…