Kijakazi

Johnson v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20243:23-cv-00481California2,400 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES JOHNSON, Case No.: 23-CV-481 JLS (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) DENYING MOTIONS

v. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND (2) OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner,

OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE

Social Security Administration; ERIC V. JUDGE’S ORDER BENHAM, Administrate Law Judge;

LAURA MIDDLETON, Administrative (ECF Nos. 80, 80-1, 81) Appeals Judge; MS. KAWANO (full 17 name and title to be ascertained); and DOES 4 to 100, Defendants. 20 Presently before the Court are pro se Plaintiff James Johnson’s Objections—which the Court liberally construes as Motions for Reconsideration (“Mots. for Recons.,” ECF Nos. 80 & 80-1)1,2—to the Court’s July 29, 2024 Order (“Order,” ECF No. 68). Also 24 1 No provision authorizes “objections” to district court orders. Given the relief sought, however, courts routinely construe such filings as motions for reconsideration. See, e.g.,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.