Kijakazi
Johnson v. Kijakazi
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES JOHNSON, Case No.: 23-CV-481 JLS (AHG)
Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) DENYING MOTIONS
v. FOR RECONSIDERATION AND (2) OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner,
OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE
Social Security Administration; ERIC V. JUDGE’S ORDER BENHAM, Administrate Law Judge;
LAURA MIDDLETON, Administrative (ECF Nos. 80, 80-1, 81) Appeals Judge; MS. KAWANO (full 17 name and title to be ascertained); and DOES 4 to 100, Defendants. 20 Presently before the Court are pro se Plaintiff James Johnson’s Objections—which the Court liberally construes as Motions for Reconsideration (“Mots. for Recons.,” ECF Nos. 80 & 80-1)1,2—to the Court’s July 29, 2024 Order (“Order,” ECF No. 68). Also 24 1 No provision authorizes “objections” to district court orders. Given the relief sought, however, courts routinely construe such filings as motions for reconsideration. See, e.g.,…