Holifield

Holifield v. NexusCw, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20243:24-cv-00353California6,903 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDREA HOLIFIELD, individually and Case No.: 3:24-cv-00353-RBM-MMP for others similarly situated,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

Plaintiffs, MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL v. CERTIFICATION OF A

COLLECTIVE ACTION PURSUANT

NEXUSCW, INC.,

TO 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) Defendant. 16 [Doc. 12] 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Andrea Holifield, Shalom Robertson, and William Johanning’s,1 on behalf of a class of similarly situated employees (“the Hourly Recruiters”)2 (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), motion for conditional certification of a collective

1 Plaintiff Holifield filed notices of consent on behalf of Robertson and Johanning to join this Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) collective action pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(3). 24 (Docs. 3, 16.) 2 In Plaintiffs’ Original Class & Collective Action Complaint (“Complaint”), they explain that the Hourly Recruiters include all hourly recruiters subject to Defendant’s overtime…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.