Cactil, LLC v. United States
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CACTIL, LLC d/b/a MyChargeBack.com, Case No.: 24cv1270-LL-AHG
Petitioner,
ORDER GRANTING CACTIL, LLC’S
v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF RULE 41(g) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
PETITION
Respondent. [ECF No. 23]
17 18 On August 23, 2024, Petitioner Cactil, LLC (“Cactil”) filed a Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support of its Rule 41(g) Petition.1 ECF No. 23. Cactil claims that the parties were directed to file briefings regarding Cactil’s two motions to unseal [ECF No. 13], and in the government’s response to the motions to unseal, it also addressed Cactil’s Rule 41(g) Petition on the merits. ECF No. 20. Cactil now requests leave to file a reply in / / /
26 1 “Rule 41(g)” refers to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g) regarding when “[a] person aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure of property or by the deprivation of 28 ||support of its Rule 41(g) Petition to address the …