Ochoa
Ochoa v. Hill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCUS ANTONIO OCHOA, Case No. 23-cv-2058-MMA (MMP)
CDCR #F-81217
ORDER DISMISSING FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR Plaintiff,
FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM
14 vs. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 1915A(b)
16 DR. JOHN HODGES; DR. LUZVIMINDA [Doc. No. 6] SAIDRO; JANE DOE, Registered Nurse; MITCHEL, ADA Seargeant, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 I. INTRODUCTION Marcus Antonio Ochoa (“Plaintiff” or “Ochoa”), a state inmate proceeding pro se, is proceeding with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court dismissed his original complaint for failure to state a claim but granted Plaintiff leave to amend. Doc. No. 3. And after an extension of time, Ochoa filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Doc. No. 6. For the reasons discussed below, the Court dismisses the FAC for failure to state a claim. II. SCREENING PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E) AND…