Justino Rupard v. County of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20243:23-cv-01357California8,247 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 ESTATE OF LONNIE RUPARD BY Case No.: 23-cv-1357-CAB-BLM

AND THROUGH HIS SUCCESSORS-

IN-INTEREST JUSTINO RUPARD & ORDER (1) DENYING MOTION TO

RONNIE RUPARD, et al, SUBSTITUTE; (2) DISMISSING SURVIVAL CLAIMS; and (3) Plaintiffs,

DENYING-IN-PART AND

v. GRANTING-IN-PART MOTIONS TO

DISMISS

COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, et al,

Defendants.

20 [Doc. Nos. 89, 119, 121] 21 This case concerns the death of decedent Lonnie Rupard (“Decedent”) on March 17, 2022 while in custody at the San Diego Central Jail. Presently before the court is (1) a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint (“SAC”) filed by Correctional Healthcare Partners [Doc. No. 89], (2) a motion to dismiss filed by the County Defendants [Doc. No. 119], and (3) an ex parte motion to substitute representative of the Estate of Lonnie Rupard filed by Plaintiffs Justino Rupard and Ronnie Rupard [Doc. No. 121]. Each motion has 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.