Stanz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Plaintiff AARON STANZ, individually Case No.: 3:22-cv-01164-GPC-JLB and derivatively on behalf of Jet Genius 12 Holdings, Inc., ORDER TO FILE RESPONSE TO MOTION TO WITHDRAW AS Plaintiff,

COUNSEL

14 v. [ECF No. 131] Defendants JORDAN BROWN; et al., 16 Defendants, 17 and

JET GENIUS HOLDINGS, INC.,

20 Nominal Defendant.

22 Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.3(f)(3) and 83.3(g), Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & 23 Savitch, LLP, including Sean M. Sullivan and Justin M. Martin, filed an ex parte motion 24 to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiff Aaron Stanz (“Plaintiff”), on grounds that Plaintiff 25 did not meet the material terms of the Engagement Agreement and that there now exist 26 irreconcilable differences. Dkt. No. 131. 27 Plaintiff has yet to file his own response to this motion. In considering a motion to 2 || withdraw as counsel, the Court must account for several factors, including whether the 3 || motion is opposed or joined by the…