Salmen

Salmen v. Terronez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20243:23-cv-01403California1,727 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JUSTIN SALMEN, Case No.: 23-CV-1403 JLS (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) ADOPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION ON

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO

DISMISS; (2) GRANTING THE

L. TERRONEZ, PARTIES’ REQUESTS FOR Defendant. JUDICIAL NOTICE; AND (3) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

MOTION

(ECF Nos. 8, 8-2, 11, 14) 20 Presently before the Court are Defendant L. Terronez’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Mot.,” ECF No. 8) and her supporting Memorandum of Points and Authorities (“Mem.,” ECF No. 8-1). Plaintiff Justin Salmen filed an Opposition to the Motion (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 10), and Defendant submitted a Reply (“Reply,” ECF No. 12). Additionally, both Parties submitted Requests for Judicial Notice (“Def.’s RJN,” ECF No. 8-2) (“Pl.’s RJN,” ECF No. 11), and Defendant filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.